Completed Arts, Culture & Design History, Languages & Philosophy

Harry Ransom Centre - Investigating the creative and critical processes of Rachel Cusk, Kazuo Ishiguro and Julian Barnes

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A novelist is digging through the archives of three living masters of experimental fiction—Rachel Cusk, Kazuo Ishiguro, and Julian Barnes—to understand how they deliberately break narrative rules, and to see whether that same critical self-awareness can fuel her own creative work. This matters because literary scholarship rarely examines the *working papers* of living authors in real time. Most archival research stops at dead writers. Here, the researcher wants to see how novelists consciously deploy techniques like disrupted chronology, fragmentation, and multiple voices—and how those choices are documented in notebooks, drafts, and correspondence. She is also testing whether polyphony (many voices in one text) still works as a method in an age of social media, where everyone already speaks in fragments. If successful, this project will produce both a creative novel and a critical thesis that model how experimental fiction is made, not just analysed. The immediate impact is on literary studies and creative writing pedagogy—showing other writers and scholars how living authors think on the page. There is no direct practical application for infrastructure or medicine. But understanding how narrative form shapes meaning has historically fed into everything from documentary filmmaking to journalism to how we tell stories about science itself.

View original technical description
I hope to come to the Harry Ransom Centre and access the papers of a selection of outstanding contemporary novelists whose creative work is at least in part experimental, both in narrative structures and techniques. I want to read about and learn from their creative processes, documented in their notebooks, correspondences, essays and edits/drafts, as they pushed the form and explored what fiction can do. These techniques include, but are not limited to, disrupted chronology, fragmentations, white space, patterning, sequencing, unusual or multiple points of view and constructions and representations of the self, all of which I explore and utilise in my own creative work. My practice based PhD is composed of interlinking critical and creative parts, specifically focussed on assessing the use of the polyphonic (multiple voices). I am putting polyphony (in this age of social media) under scrutiny not just as method but also as a subject. I am interested in researching the symbiotic and essential relationship between a writers critical self awareness and creative endeavour as evidenced through their papers, as this is also the process of my PhD. The Harry Ransom Centre has extensive archives and although I have identified specific collections I wish to examine there are many more that are of interest, including Ian McEwan, J.M. Coetzee and Penelope Fitzgerald. This opportunity would be of immense benefit to my work academically and creatively.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Alison Woodhouse (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

The Peckham Experiment: Fiction from the Archives
The Visual Spaces of Poetry 1920-2021
Digital Publishing and The Reader
The Work of Art in Contemporary Japan: Inner and outer worlds of creativity
The Audiovisual Essay: a digital methodology for film and media studies

Original classification

Training Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.