Completed Genetics & Molecular Biology Cells, Biochemistry & Physiology

Studying neurogenesis through developmental time.

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A single protein switch inside developing brain cells stops them from turning into neurons too early, and researchers want to know exactly how it works. The brain must produce the right number of neurons at the right time during development. If progenitor cells—the brain’s stem cells—differentiate too soon, the brain ends up with too few cells. If they wait too long, the brain may be malformed. Scientists understand that two separate mechanisms hold these cells in check, but the molecular details remain unclear. This project aims to map the specific proteins and genes involved in both systems. This is fundamental science. It will not produce a drug or a diagnostic test in the near term. But understanding how the brain builds itself is essential for explaining what goes wrong in neurodevelopmental disorders such as microcephaly or autism. Past discoveries about how cells decide their fates have led to breakthroughs in regenerative medicine and cancer biology. A clearer picture of progenitor maintenance could, in time, inform strategies for repairing damaged brain tissue or correcting developmental errors.

View original technical description
In this proposal, we aim to understand two mechanisms of progenitor maintenance. The first mechanism is set up before neural induction and it inherently inhibits a population of apicobasally polarised progenitor cells from undergoing premature neurogenesis. The serine-threonine kinase aPKC is sufficient and necessary to maintain the progenitor state of these cells. In aim 1, we will identify phosphorylation targets of aPKC by a candidate and an unbiased proteomics approach and we will determine the transcriptome of these progenitors by microarray analysis. The second mechanism follows neural induction, and it operates within a second population of progenitors, which are apolar. This mechanism depends on the localised expression of transcription factors, such as Foxg1. Since FoxG1 is expressed in both progenitors and differentiated neurons in the forebrain, we reasoned that its activity may be distinguished by co-factors and post-translational modifications; these will be characteri sed in aim 2. To link the control of FoxG1 with its transcriptional output, we will identify the transcriptional targets of FoxG1 by ChIP-seq and microarray analysis. To link the two, in aim 3, we will undertake lineage-tracing experiments to understand whether different mechanisms of inhibiting differentiation early on, have a lasting impact on progenitor fate.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Nancy Papalopulu (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Molecular control of self-renewal and neurogenic characteristics of cortical progenitors
The genetic mechanisms underlying the regenerative potential of ensheathing glial cells in Drosophila
A genome-wide analysis of Notch signalling in neural stem cells and neurons
How are astrocytes made? Transcriptional regulation of astrocyte specification across development and adulthood.
Investigating the origin of long-term dividing neural progenitors in vertebrate embryogenesis

Original classification

Senior Research Fellowship Basic Renewal

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.