Exploiting the potential offered by the increasing computerisation of health records for population based research.
In plain English
AI plain-English summaryDoctors already know that inflammation plays a role in heart attacks and strokes, but they lack practical ways to turn that knowledge into routine prevention. This research programme will use the UK’s electronic health records to run clinical trials and observational studies that are embedded directly into everyday patient care. The problem is that most evidence on inflammation and cardiovascular disease comes from laboratory experiments or expensive, separate clinical trials. That gap means patients with chronic inflammatory conditions—such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis—do not have reliable tools to predict their personal risk of a heart attack or stroke. The same is true for people who experience acute flare-ups of lung disease, which may temporarily spike their vascular risk. If this research succeeds, it could change how the NHS delivers preventive medicine. One trial will test whether a short course of statins given during periods of heightened risk—for example, after a hospital admission for a lung infection—can prevent large numbers of heart attacks and strokes. Another study will assess whether the shingles vaccine also reduces vascular events after a shingles infection. The work will also produce validated risk calculators for people with chronic inflammatory disorders, allowing GPs to target prevention more precisely. Beyond these specific results, the programme aims to establish electronic health records as a standard platform for rigorous medical research, making future trials cheaper, faster, and more representative of real-world patients.
View original technical description
View the original record at the funder ↗
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
Senior Research Fellowship Clinical RenewalPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know