Completed Economics & Business Plants, Animals & Ecology

Infrastructure for an open platform-publishing ecosystem

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

eLife is building a new publishing system where scientific papers are posted as preprints first, then reviewed and curated by independent groups, rather than going through traditional journal peer review. This matters because the current journal-based system is slow, expensive, and often gates access behind paywalls. Preprints—papers posted publicly before peer review—are already widespread in biomedical science, but there is no standard way to organise, review, or signal quality across them. Without that infrastructure, researchers and funders cannot easily distinguish rigorous preprints from unreliable ones, limiting how useful preprints can be as a primary publication route. If successful, this project will create an end-to-end workflow that lets authors submit a preprint, have it reviewed by participating groups, and have the reviewed version curated and discoverable through Sciety—a platform eLife already runs. Over three years, the team will first develop the full workflow with one “model customer,” then adapt it for multiple publishers and funders. By integrating with existing preprint servers like bioRxiv and open-source tools, the system slots into the current ecosystem rather than replacing it. The result could shift how biomedical research is communicated: faster, more transparent, and less dependent on traditional journals.

View original technical description
In recent years, eLife has embraced the rise of preprints in the biomedical sciences and adapted its processes to make the review of preprints its central goal. We have developed Sciety, which allows researchers to discover refereed preprints from across the web, to highlight the value of preprint review as an alternative to traditional journal publishing. We aim to create a new publishing model where research is published as a preprint, then reviewed and curated by participating groups. This proposal outlines the steps required to build out an end-to-end workflow to support this model. Over three years we will develop Sciety to support author submission, peer review management and community curation. Over the first year we will work with a ‘model customer’ to develop the full workflow, then spend two years enhancing and adapting the model for a diverse range of partners, including publishers and funders. We will work with existing preprint servers such as bioRxiv, open source providers such as Coko Foundation, and journal providers such as PubPub, thereby fitting into the existing ecosystem rather than building a new one. This approach, combined with our existing work to build the community, will ensure the long-term success of the platform.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Damian Pattinson (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

eLife Pathways: Building a collaborative open science ecosystem with integrated technology and services
Beyond the journal: a Microbiology Society open research platform
Shaping the future of science communication
Supporting Longform output Open Access
Rapid PREreview: A rapid preprint review platform to support outbreak science

Original classification

Discretionary Award - Open research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.