Greener Trials: Building the evidence base to improve the environmental sustainability of healthcare and healthcare research
In plain English
AI plain-English summaryClinical trials are generating thousands of tonnes of carbon dioxide each year, and researchers now want to measure and shrink that footprint systematically. The problem is that no standard, widely adopted method exists for calculating the environmental cost of a clinical trial. Public and private sector organisations have begun collaborating on a common footprinting approach, but trials are governed, funded, and managed differently across sectors. This means the existing tools and guidance need to be adapted and tested for each community before their results can be combined to identify shared hotspots and effective mitigation strategies. Alongside the carbon accounting, the team will study the human behaviours that either support or block change—turning a technical fix into a lasting shift in research culture. If this succeeds, the project will produce an open online interface that makes the footprinting methodology, a calculator, and a global dataset freely available to all trial communities. That would allow funders, universities, and pharmaceutical companies to compare emissions across studies, spot the biggest sources of waste, and redesign trial protocols to be less carbon-intensive. The work does not promise a cure or a new device, but it could quietly reshape how medical research is planned and run—reducing its climate impact without compromising its scientific value.
View original technical description
View the original record at the funder ↗
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
Discretionary AwardPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know