Active Economics & Business Computing & AI

The University of Essex and Bowen Craggs & Co Limited KTP 24_25 R3

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A company is building an automated tool that uses generative AI to score how effectively large organisations communicate on their websites. Corporate websites are often the first place people go for information about a company—investors checking financial reports, journalists fact-checking a story, customers looking for contact details. Yet there is no standard, automated way to measure whether that communication is clear, consistent, and useful. Current methods rely on manual audits that are slow, expensive, and hard to compare across organisations. This project aims to fill that gap by turning a proprietary methodology for evaluating online corporate communications into a software tool that runs on generative AI. If the tool works, it could let companies benchmark their own websites against competitors in hours rather than weeks. For the public, that might mean more transparent and easier-to-navigate corporate information. The research is applied and commercially focused—it is not fundamental science, but a practical engineering challenge with a clear end-user in mind.

View original technical description
To apply generative AI capabilities for the design of a bespoke, automated benchmarking tool based on a unique methodology, for online corporate communications measurement.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

The University of Essex and Cooper Parry Advisory Limited KTP 24_25 R5
The University of Essex and Climbing Trees Online Marketing KTP 24_25 R2
The University of Essex and Croud Inc Limited KTP 22_23 R4
The University of Essex and Gerald McDonald & Company Limited KTP 22_23 R1
The University of Essex and Element Softworks Limited KTP 23_24 R6

Original classification

Knowledge Transfer Partnership

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.