Upcoming History, Languages & Philosophy Society, Politics & Law
Gods’ Shadows. Anthropologies of (Divine) Kingship in Central Asia: Persia, Greece, India, and the Steppes: ca. 330-150 BCE
Summary
Original abstract (not yet simplified)The Gosh project will develop a comparative anthropological framework to investigate Central Asian kingship, roughly modern Afghanistan, Northern Uzbekistan, Western Tajikistan, Eastern Turkmenistan, during the Hellenistic period, aiming at replacing outdated binaries that rely on shopworn dichotomies (Greek/Oriental, East/West), or leave the vast extent of Central Asia embedded in ‘Silk Road’ narratives of transit and exchange merely linking other ‘core’...
View original technical description
The Gosh project will develop a comparative anthropological framework to investigate Central Asian kingship, roughly modern Afghanistan, Northern Uzbekistan, Western Tajikistan, Eastern Turkmenistan, during the Hellenistic period, aiming at replacing outdated binaries that rely on shopworn dichotomies (Greek/Oriental, East/West), or leave the vast extent of Central Asia embedded in ‘Silk Road’ narratives of transit and exchange merely linking other ‘core’ regions of ancient Afro-Eurasia. World-historical, comparative research on kingship does not engage with Central Asian material, particularly coins, a key source on Baktrian ideology of power. Specialists in the region overlook the potential of the social sciences (especially anthropology) for their agendas. By focusing on the Hellenistic Baktrian Empire (ca. 330-150 BCE), I seek to bridge this divide, offering a new methodological framework for approaching Central Asian kingship comparatively across disciplinary boundaries and scholarly traditions. I aim to do so by comparing the coins’ visual vocabulary and titles with Near Eastern (particularly Achaemenid), Indic, and steppic sources on the ideology, rhetoric, visual cultures, and performances of kingship to redress the focus on Alexander’s model, showing how Baktrian monarchy emerged out of the interplay of multiple distinct but interconnected traditions. The project draws on anthropological theories of sacred kingship to examine the role played by religious and cultic traditions in shaping royal self-representation and driving cultural and political change, contributing to the scholarship of global history, political theory, and anthropology. GOSH will present a revisionist theory of the spiritual politics of Baktrian kingship based on a new empirical understanding of its visual cultures. Beyond ethnic affiliations and cultural divides, Baktrian kingship is reframed as part of a dynamic network of power, ideological interplay, and cultural exchange.
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
The King in the Round: can numismatics be used to identify a unified form of Hellenistic kingship?
Becoming king: the rise of kingship in Europe, c. 950- c. 1215
Horse Power: Interactions between China, Mongolia and the steppe 2000-0 BCE
Greeks and Barbarians: Connected Histories (archaic-hellenistic periods)
Body-Politics: Personhood, Sexuality, and Death in the Iron and Viking Ages
Original classification
HORIZONPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know