Completed Public Health & Healthcare Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions

Pandemic preparedness: local and global concepts and practices in tackling disease threats in Africa

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

The word “preparedness” has become a global health buzzword since the 2014-15 West African Ebola epidemic, but no one has asked what it actually means to the people who must live with disease threats every day. This research uses anthropology—through interviews, focus groups, and oral history in Sierra Leone and Uganda—to examine the gap between how international health agencies define preparedness and how local communities already anticipate and handle outbreaks. The problem is that top-down preparedness plans often fail because they ignore local knowledge, trust networks, and everyday survival strategies. If this work succeeds, it could reshape how pandemic response programmes are designed, making them more effective by connecting global policy with community-level realities. There is no immediate practical application here; this is fundamental social science that asks what preparedness *is* before prescribing what it *should be*. Past anthropological insights have transformed public health campaigns—for example, by revealing why people resist vaccination or ignore official warnings—and this project aims to do the same for pandemic response infrastructure.

View original technical description
Since the Ebola epidemic in West Africa in 2014-15, the notion of disease ‘preparedness’ has gained prominence in global health policy. Yet ‘preparedness’ remains ambiguous, inviting critical scrutiny. Who, or what, exactly, is being prepared for what, and by whom? We propose research to examine the concept of ‘preparedness’ by exploring diverse meanings and uses of the term from an anthropological perspective, with specific focus on any gap between preparedness as understood in global health, and ‘preparedness from below’ (how communities anticipate and deal with disease threats on a daily basis). Three key themes are addressed - risk and uncertainty, knowledge and information, and agency and responsibility. The meanings of ‘preparedness’ globally, and how the idea is mobilised in policy, research and implementation, will be examined. We also ask what concepts and practices of preparedness might be locally salient in two countries, Sierra Leone and Uganda, and how ideas ‘travel’ both upwards and downwards between local, national, regional and global levels. Examining different perspectives on pandemic preparedness via multi-sited ethnography, oral history, focus groups, interviews and participatory methods, we will identify pathways for connecting them, towards more effective preparedness and response approaches informed by a critical medical anthropology.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Melissa Leach (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Shock tactics: urban health futures in the wake of Ebola
Epidemics in Refugee Settlements.An Ethnogrpahic exploration of 'Preparedness' in Palabek Refugee Settlement, Northern Uganda,during times of COVID-19
Building resilient health systems: lessons from international, national and local emergency responses to the Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone.
Anthropology of Ebola: Transmission Dynamics and Outbreak Socialities
Crisis of Confidence: The Politics of Evidence and (Mis)Trust in Epidemic Preparedness

Original classification

Collaborative Award in H&SS

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.