Pandemic preparedness: local and global concepts and practices in tackling disease threats in Africa
In plain English
AI plain-English summaryThe word “preparedness” has become a global health buzzword since the 2014-15 West African Ebola epidemic, but no one has asked what it actually means to the people who must live with disease threats every day. This research uses anthropology—through interviews, focus groups, and oral history in Sierra Leone and Uganda—to examine the gap between how international health agencies define preparedness and how local communities already anticipate and handle outbreaks. The problem is that top-down preparedness plans often fail because they ignore local knowledge, trust networks, and everyday survival strategies. If this work succeeds, it could reshape how pandemic response programmes are designed, making them more effective by connecting global policy with community-level realities. There is no immediate practical application here; this is fundamental social science that asks what preparedness *is* before prescribing what it *should be*. Past anthropological insights have transformed public health campaigns—for example, by revealing why people resist vaccination or ignore official warnings—and this project aims to do the same for pandemic response infrastructure.
View original technical description
View the original record at the funder ↗
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
Collaborative Award in H&SSPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know