Completed Lungs & Breathing Pregnancy, Children & Inherited Conditions

BREATHE: Building Respiratory support in East Africa Through High flow versus low flow oxygen Evaluation

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

In sub-Saharan Africa, 20 million critically ill adults each year struggle to get enough oxygen into their blood, and doctors do not yet know which oxygen delivery device saves the most lives. The problem is that low-flow nasal cannulas and facemasks cannot provide enough oxygen for severely ill patients, while CPAP machines risk causing pneumonia in patients who are drowsy or confused, and mechanical ventilators require expensive equipment, constant electricity, and highly trained staff that are scarce in low-income countries. High-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC) have reduced the need for ventilators in wealthy countries, but no one has tested whether they cut deaths in settings where ventilators are largely unavailable. If this trial shows that HFNC lowers mortality, it will give governments and aid organisations a clear, practical target for investment. Rather than guessing which oxygen delivery system to scale up, they could deploy a device that works without the infrastructure demands of ventilators. The project also includes implementation strategies—training, supply chains, maintenance plans—so the evidence does not sit on a shelf but changes how oxygen is delivered in real wards.

View original technical description
With this funding, we hope to achieve a decrease in mortality for the 20 million critically ill adults in sub-Saharan Africa with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. In the setting of COVID-19, governmental and nongovernmental organizations are working toward improving oxygen availability through large PSA plants and bedside oxygen concentrators. While sources of oxygen are increasing, what remains unknown is the impact of using different delivery systems for oxygen, which include low flow nasal cannula and facemasks, HFNC, CPAP, and invasive ventilation. Low flow systems are limited in the degree of oxygen support they can provide and are therefore only appropriate for mildly hypoxemic patients; non-invasive CPAP carries a significant aspiration risk for patients with altered mental status and requires close monitoring by trained staff; mechanical ventilation requires even more significant infrastructure, consumables, and human resources to operate safely. In HICs, HFNC has been shown to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation, and in some cases reduce mortality. In LICs, where safe mechanical ventilation is largely unavailable, we predict a robust mortality reduction. This funding will yield definitive evidence for HFNC’s impact on mortality, and develop the resources to widely disseminate that evidence, including comprehensive strategies for implementation and scaling.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Bethany Hedt-Gauthier (EPMC Awardee)Elisabeth Riviello (EPMC Awardee)Sky Vanderburg (EPMC Awardee)Theogene Twagirumugabe (EPMC Awardee)Wangari Waweru-Siika (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

A multicentre, prospective, randomized, open label, stepped wedge clinical trial of respiratory support with standard low flow oxygen therapy, frugal continuous positive airway pressure, and high-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure
Effectiveness of Noninvasive ventilation and High flow nasal oxygen therapy in severe Community Acquired Pneumonia
Emergency oxygen response for COVID-19
MICA: Children's Oxygen Administration Strategies Trial
Breathing Assistance in CHildren with bronchiolitis (BACHb): a group-sequential two-stratum multicentre open-label randomised clinical trial of respiratory support in infants with acute bronchiolitis

Original classification

Innovations LMIC Flagship

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.