What impact does social care involvement under Section 17 or Section 47 have on children’s mental health and educational outcomes?
In plain English
AI plain-English summaryEvery year, thousands of children in England are visited by social workers under Section 17 or Section 47 of the Children Act—but no one knows whether those visits actually help or harm them. This matters because social care involvement is assumed to be beneficial for children who remain with their families, yet the assumption has never been tested. While studies exist for children taken into care, the vast majority—those who stay at home—have been ignored. This leaves policymakers and social workers flying blind: they cannot know whether a Section 17 support plan or a Section 47 child protection investigation improves a child’s mental health or school performance, or makes things worse. The researcher will use a quasi-experimental design on a large administrative dataset to compare outcomes for children who received social care involvement with those who did not. If the research succeeds, it will provide the first evidence on whether these interventions work, for whom, and under what conditions. That could reshape how local authorities allocate resources, how social workers prioritise cases, and how children’s services are designed—potentially improving the life trajectories of vulnerable children without removing them from their homes.
View original technical description
View the original record at the funder ↗
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
Early-Career AwardPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know