Active Mental Health Psychology & Behaviour

Taking lived experience involvement in mental health research forward: developing a Mental Health Treatment Acceptability Measure (MHTA).

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Nearly half of patients with major psychiatric disorders stop taking their medication because they find it unacceptable, yet no existing treatment acceptability measure has involved patients in its design. This research addresses a fundamental gap in mental health care: the mismatch between what researchers measure—clinical efficacy—and what patients actually experience. Current measures ignore factors like treatment burden, side effects, and personal attitudes that determine whether someone will stick with a therapy. The researcher aims to build a national centre of excellence in lived experience methods, starting by developing a Mental Health Treatment Acceptability Measure (MHTA) co-created with people who have mental health problems. If successful, the MHTA could transform how treatments are evaluated and designed. Clinicians and drug developers would have a standardised tool to assess whether a treatment is not just effective but also tolerable and practical for patients. This could reduce non-adherence rates, improve treatment outcomes, and make mental health care more responsive to what patients actually need. The broader goal is to embed lived experience expertise permanently into mental health research, shifting the field’s priorities from purely symptom reduction to patient-centred acceptability.

View original technical description
I aim to establish a national centre of excellence in lived experience methods in mental health, initially in the form of a new research group. To do this, I will conduct a research study to gain the research leadership experience and training needed to become a group leader. The study will be an exemplar of the type of work the group will undertake. The first topic to be addressed will be treatment acceptability. Mental health research usually focuses on how well a treatment works on reducing clinical symptoms – efficacy. However, many patients do not find commonly used treatments to be acceptable. For example: ‘49% of major psychiatric disorder patients were non-adherent to their psychotropic medication’ (19). There is a gap between research and the views of patients. I propose addressing this by measuring treatment ‘acceptability’ which includes a range of factors such as overall ‘burden’, attitudes towards treatment, etc. Very few treatment acceptability measures exist for mental health. None have had any stated involvement of people with mental health problems. My proposal is to develop a treatment acceptability measure tailored for common mental health treatment types. By measuring acceptability, we can make treatments better and more accessible for everyone.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Thomas Kabir (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Developing an intervention to support discussion between mental health staff and patients after a Mental Health Act assessment
A Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating Attention Training Technique in Psychosis: A Feasibility Study
ANTONA-MH: Accelerating New Therapies with Objective Neurophysiological Assessment for Mental Health
The development of a nature-on-prescription group intervention for people with common mental health conditions
Developing a recovery focus in mental health services in England

Original classification

Wellcome Accelerator Awards

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.