Modelling Social Interaction: Can Incorporating Empirical Social Network Data in Public Health Economic Models Better Inform Public Health Interventions?
In plain English
AI plain-English summarySmokers, heavy drinkers, and sedentary people tend to cluster together in real life, but the computer models that guide public health spending largely ignore this fact. Most health economic models treat people as isolated individuals, even though decades of evidence show that behaviours like smoking, drinking, and physical inactivity spread through social networks. Only 3% of social simulation studies between 1998 and 2015 used real-world network data; the rest relied on theoretical or spatial approximations. This matters because flawed models can produce flawed policy recommendations—for example, underestimating how effectively a smoking cessation programme might ripple through a community. The research will review current modelling practices, develop more efficient computational methods for handling large populations, and directly compare models built on empirical network data against those using theoretical networks. If successful, it could give policymakers more accurate tools for designing interventions that account for how people actually influence one another, potentially improving the cost-effectiveness of public health spending on non-communicable diseases.
View original technical description
View the original record at the funder ↗
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
PhD Studentship (Basic)Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know