Completed Heart, Stroke & Blood Cancer

Effect of Remote Ischaemic preConditioning on Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing Coronary Artery bypass graft surgery (ERICCA study): A multicentre double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A blood pressure cuff on the upper arm, inflated and deflated in short cycles before heart surgery, may reduce the risk of death, heart attack, stroke, or repeat procedures in high-risk patients. This matters because patients with a EuroSCORE of 6 or higher—indicating significant underlying disease—face a roughly 20% chance of a major cardiac or cerebral event within a year of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Current treatments do not reliably lower that risk. The ERICCA trial tests whether remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIC), a simple, non-drug intervention, can do so. RIC involves three five-minute cycles of cuff inflation to 200 mmHg, then deflation, on the upper arm before surgery. The control group receives an uninflated cuff for 30 minutes. If RIC reduces the one-year rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events by 27% (from 20% to 14.6%), it would offer a cheap, safe, and widely applicable tool for protecting high-risk cardiac surgery patients. The trial also measures kidney injury, hospital stay length, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. With 1,610 patients across nine UK centres, the results could change standard preoperative care for thousands of patients annually.

View original technical description
(a) Research Design: Multi-centre double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial. (b) Study Population: High-risk patients (additive Euro-SCORE of 6 or more) undergoing CABG±valve surgery. (c) Planned Interventions: Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIC) comprising three 5 min cycles of inflation (to 200mmHg) and deflation of a cuff placed on the upper arm. Control will comprise placing an un-inflated cuff on the upper arm for 30 minutes. (d) Proposed outcome measures: Primary outcome: Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events at one year (MACCE- death, myocardial infarction, revascularisation, stroke). Secondary outcomes: Peri-operative myocardial and renal injury; Length of ITU/hospital stay and inotrope score; 6 minute walk test; Quality of life analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. There will be an echo substudy assessing left ventricular ejection fraction. (e) Assessment and follow up: Outcome measures will be assessed from the patient GP and medical notes, questionnaires (at 3, 6, 9 months) and 6 week and one year outpatient appointments. Safety will be assessed using a Standard Operating Procedure. (f) Proposed sample size: In the SYNTAX study, the MACCE rate was 12.4% at 12 months in CABG patients at lower risk than those proposed for this trial (mean EuroSCORE 3.8)(Serruys et al NEJM 2009;360:961). In a study of high-risk patients with left main stem coronary lesions the MACCE rate at 12 months was 25% (Lee et al JACC 2006;47:864). For our high-risk patients we have estimated a MACCE rate of 20%. Therefore, to detect a 27% relative risk reduction in this primary endpoint (from 20.0% to 14.6%), with a power of 80% and a significance level of 5%, a sample size of 770 patients will be required for each trial arm (1540 in total). A trial of this size would detect an observed relative reduction of 20% (i.e. a risk ratio of 0.8) as statistically significant based on an event rate in the control arm of 20%. To allow for dropouts (4-5% in SYNTAX study) we plan to recruit 1610 patients in total based on 4.5% dropout rate. (g) Statistical analysis: Survival analyses will be carried out for the primary MACCE clinical endpoint at one year. MACCE as well as individual components (e.g. mortality); hazard ratios and confidence intervals, together with p-values will be calculated using Cox’s proportional hazards modelling. All analyses will be carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. (h) Project timetables including recruitment rate: Total duration of study: 48 months. (1) 0-6 months- Study preparation; (2) 6-30 months- Patient recruitment; (3) 18-42 months- One year follow-up; (4) 42-48 months- Data analysis, reporting and dissemination of results. To recruit 1610 high-risk CABG±valve patients over 24 months, each of the 9 recruiting centres will need to recruit on average 2 patients per week (180 patients in total), which is about 25% of the eligible 7-10 patients per week.

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

A multicentre randomised trial of surgical versus percutaneous revascularisation of ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction in the United Kingdom, with embedded internal pilot and health economic analysis (BCIS4)
Complete Versus Lesion-only PRimary PCI pilot -Cardiac MRI substudy (CVLPRI-t-CMR)
REVascularisation of Ischaemic VEntricular Dysfunction (REVIVED): a randomised comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention (with optimal medical therapy) vs. optimal medical therapy alone for heart failure secondary to coronary disease
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intracoronary Administration of Adenosine or Sodium Nitroprusside to Control for Attenuation of Microvascular Obstruction During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Feasibility Study of Early Outpatient Review and Early Cardiac Rehabilitation After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Mixed Methods Research Design (FARSTER-I).

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.