CompletedPsychology & BehaviourPublic Health & Healthcare
BRIGHT Trial: Brushing RemInder 4 Good oral HealTh: the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a Short Messaging Service behaviour change programme to improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas
A text-message programme will test whether regular reminders to brush teeth can cut the rate of tooth decay among 5,040 teenagers in deprived areas of the UK. One in three 12-year-olds in the UK has dental caries, and the problem hits poorest communities hardest. Brushing twice daily with fluoride toothpaste is proven to prevent decay, but many teenagers simply do not do it. The BRIGHT trial adapts a New Zealand programme that boosted toothbrushing in unemployed young adults, aiming to see if a similar approach works for younger teens in UK schools. If the intervention succeeds, it could offer a cheap, scalable way to reduce oral health inequalities without requiring extra dental visits. The programme combines a single classroom session with automated text reminders over 2.5 years. Researchers will measure whether this cuts the proportion of teenagers with obvious decay from 34% to 26%, and whether the approach is cost-effective over a lifetime. If it works, the NHS and schools could adopt the system nationwide, potentially preventing thousands of cases of tooth decay in children who currently bear the highest burden of the disease.
View original technical description
BACKGROUND: Dental caries affects 1 in 3 UK 12 year-olds and is closely linked to deprivation. Brushing with fluoridated toothpaste is a highly effective preventive measure. The Keep on Brushing SMS programme in New Zealand increased self-reported toothbrushing in unemployed young people (aged 18-24 years) over 10-weeks. AIM: The BRIGHT trial will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a SMS behaviour change programme with a classroom-based session to improve the oral health of young people living in deprived areas. DESIGN: Multi-centre, school based, assessor-blinded, two-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot trial. Internal Pilot Trial: Aimed to randomise 1,200 young people (aged 11-12 and 12-13 years) from 10 schools at the year-group level to intervention or control group. Key progression criteria: 1) An indication of a positive effect of the intervention on self-reported frequency of tooth brushing at approximately 3 months using an 80% one-sided confidence interval approach; 2) Engagement with 80% of the schools required for the main trial and obtain agreement to participate, in principle; 3) Recruiting an average of 48 young people per year group from the 10 schools included in the pilot trial; 4) Minimum 80% response rate to questionnaires completed by young people; A mixed-method process evaluation will complement the outcome evaluation and examine implementation, mechanisms of impact and context, as per Medical Research Council guidance. SETTING: 42 Secondary Schools (with an above average percentage of pupils eligible for free school meals) across England (South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire), Scotland and South Wales. TARGET POPULATION: 5040 young people (11-13 years at trial entry) attending school in UK deprived areas. HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES BEING ASSESSED: The BRIGHT intervention, based on the New Zealand Keep on Brushing programme, comprises a curriculum-embedded classroom-based session (CBS) and a series of follow-up text messages for young people living in deprived areas, and is compared to routine education and no text messaging. SAMPLE SIZE: Based on the pilot trial, it was estimated that approximately 5040 young people from 42 schools would be required in total across the main trial and internal pilot, using within-school cluster randomisation (year group level, where schools are randomised to deliver the intervention to either 11-12 year olds [Year 7/S1] or 12-13 year olds [Year 8/S2], with the other year group allocated to control). This sample size would give 90% power (5% two-sided a) to detect an 8% absolute reduction, from 34% to 26%, in the proportion of young people with ’obvious decay experience’ and is based on a conservative assumed intra-cluster correction coefficient of 0.02, an average of 60 young people per year group and 20% attrition at follow-up. MEASUREMENT OF COSTS AND OUTCOMES: Primary outcome • Caries prevalence for ‘obvious decay experience’ at approximately 2.5 years: Presence of at least one treated or untreated carious lesion in any permanent tooth, measured at the young person-level at the 2.5 year follow-up using the permanent tooth index ‘DMFT’ (Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth), where decay is measured as carious lesions extending into dentine - International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) levels 4-6 (‘obvious decay experience’). Secondary outcomes • Self-reported frequency of twice-daily toothbrushing at time of CBS (pilot only), between CBS and 12 weeks (pilot only), 6 months, 1 year, 2 years (pilot only) and 2.5 years; plaque levels and gingivitis at 2 (pilot only) and 2.5 years). • Caries prevalence for all carious lesions at 2 (pilot only) and 2.5 years - Presence of at least one treated or untreated carious lesion of any severity (ICDAS levels 1-6) in any permanent tooth at 2 (pilot only) and 2.5 years clinical follow-up. • Number of treated or untreated carious teeth (using the DMFT) at 2 (pilot only) and 2.5 years (ICDAS 1-6), and caries into dentine (ICDAS 4-6) at 2 (pilot only) and 2.5 years follow-up. • Caries prevalence for obvious decay experience at 2 years (pilot only) - Presence of at least one treated or untreated carious lesion in any permanent tooth, measured at the young person-level using DMFT where decay is measured as caries into dentine (ICDAS levels 4-6), at 2 years follow-up (pilot only). • Child health-related quality of life and oral health-related quality of life (Child Health Utility-9D and CARIES-QC at 1, 2 [pilot only] and 2.5 years). • School Attendance at 1, 2 (pilot only) and 2.5 years. Cost-effectiveness • Resource use will be assessed via parent questionnaires at 1, 2 (pilot only) and 2.5 years and may be estimated from routine data sources. Quality adjusted life years will be calculated using CHU-9D data from young people via questionnaires. Cost-effectiveness will be calculated over 2.5 years and modelled to a child’s lifetime. PROJECT TIMETABLE: Start date: 01/01/17; pilot recruitment start: 01/08/2017; Main trial recruitment start: 01/07/18; follow up over 2.5 years; final report submission: 31/07/22. EXPERTISE IN TEAM Child oral health, secondary education, trial methods, trial statistics, health economics, digital technology, process evaluation, behaviour change, patient/ public involvement.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know