Recipient organisationAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Funding£2.0M
PeriodApr 2018 — Sept 2026
In plain English
AI plain-English summary
Every year, hundreds of critically ill infants with bronchiolitis are placed on mechanical ventilators in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and this trial tests whether giving them surfactant—a soap-like substance that coats the lungs—can shorten the time they spend on a breathing machine. Bronchiolitis is a common viral lung infection in babies, but in severe cases it causes life-threatening respiratory failure. Current standard care is supportive: oxygen and ventilation while the body fights the virus. No drug has been proven to speed recovery. Surfactant therapy is already used for premature babies with underdeveloped lungs, but its effect on full-term or older infants with infected lungs is unknown. If surfactant works, it could reduce the number of days infants spend sedated and intubated on a ventilator—lowering risks of lung injury, infection, and long-term developmental harm. It could also shorten PICU and hospital stays, easing pressure on NHS intensive care beds. The nested mechanistic study will clarify *why* surfactant might help: by boosting the infant’s own surfactant production, dampening airway inflammation, or clearing specific pathogens. Even if the primary outcome is negative, the mechanistic data will guide future trials.
View original technical description
Setting: 14 Paediatric Intensive Care Units. Patient group: Term born infants age <26 weeks old and preterm born infants with corrected age < 26 weeks old; including infants with Chronic Lung Disease of Prematurity and other sequelae of premature birth. Design: Phase 2 efficacy study comprising a randomised blinded placebo-controlled trial and a nested mechanistic sub-study. Randomisation: Standard care plus intervention or standard care plus air-placebo sham procedure. Intervention: Endotracheal porcine surfactant (poractant alfa), first dose 200mg/kg, repeated 12 hourly at 100mg/kg while intubated for mechanical ventilation (MV), for a maximum of 3 doses. Control: Air-placebo sham procedure. Consent: Prospective written informed consent from a person with parental responsibility per NIHR clinical trials toolkit for trials involving critically ill children. Blinding: Usual clinical staff and investigators will be blinded to the intervention. Intervention or sham procedure will be delivered by a study respiratory therapist or other staff not otherwise involved in managing MV, or making decisions to wean or extubate. Eligibility: Infants on conventional MV for life-threatening respiratory failure due to community acquired bronchiolitis of any aetiology. Diagnosis of bronchiolitis based on clinical diagnosis per SIGN Guideline 91 & NICE NG9. Exclusions: Pre-existing co-morbidity/congenital anomaly, e.g. cyanotic heart disease, neuromuscular disease. MV for primary apnoea rather than respiratory failure. Intubated for >48 hours before recruitment. Requiring ECMO or oscillation prior to recruitment. When decision to wean to extubation has already been made. Participant discontinuation criteria: clinical judgment that intervention is futile. Primary outcome measure: Duration of MV after randomisation defined as time to final extubation in hours. Secondary outcomes measures: Parent reported outcome measure (The Liverpool Respiratory Symptom Questionnaire) at 6m & 12m. All cause mortality and readmissions to d90. Peripheral Oxygen Saturation/Fraction Inspired Oxygen (SpO2/FiO2), Ventilation Index (VI) and Oxygenation Index (OI) measured prior to and 12 hourly after intervention. Time from randomisation to readiness for Spontaneous Breathing Test. Duration of non-invasive respiratory support & supplemental oxygen. Duration of stay on PICU & in hospital. Others per Detailed Project Description (DPD) Power: please see DPD Analysis: Intention to treat. For primary outcome measure, difference between group geometric mean durations of MV. For secondary outcome measures differences between groups by: mean difference of LRSQ scores; relative risk for all cause mortality at d90; and joint modelling of the longitudinal data for SpO2/FiO2, VI and OI with the duration of MV. Duration of follow-up: 90 days for primary analysis. Mechanistic sub-study. We will explore proposed mechanisms of efficacy and failure by serial sampling of Broncho-Alveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) while intubated. Hypotheses to test include: i) "Synthesis of endogenous surfactant is modulated by exogenous surfactant", using a non-radioactive stable isotope label protocol. ii) "Lower airway inflammation is modulated by exogenous surfactant", by focused analysis of inflammatory pathway cytokines. iii) "Treatment efficacy or failure is associated with detection of specific pathogens", by assay for bacterial and viral pathogens by multiplex PCR
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know