Active Climate, Earth & Environment Public Health & Healthcare

REACT: Resilient and Equitable Health Workforce to Address Climate Threats

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Nepal and Zimbabwe are testing new ways to train and support health workers to cope with heatwaves, floods, and disease outbreaks driven by climate change. This matters because the health workforce in low- and middle-income countries is often unprepared for climate-related health emergencies. Existing systems lack training, safe working conditions, and strong links between clinics and communities. The project fills a gap by co-designing interventions with local health workers, managers, and community members, rather than imposing top-down solutions. If successful, the research could produce a replicable model for strengthening health system resilience in climate-vulnerable regions. This might mean clinics that stay open during floods, health workers who can spot heatstroke early, and community volunteers who deliver basic care when roads are cut. The project also builds long-term capacity by training four PhD and four MSc students, and by strengthening local research organisations in Zimbabwe and Nepal. The ultimate goal is a health workforce that can keep providing care when the next climate shock arrives.

View original technical description
Background: Climate crisis is a global health threat. Heatwaves, droughts, floods and landslides cause substantial morbidity and mortality either directly or indirectly through infectious diseases, respiratory illnesses and food insecurity. The health workforce (HWF) is critical for supporting response to climate crisis through providing care and treatment and fostering development of climate-resilient communities. However, there is evidence that the HWF has suboptimal resilience to climate crisis, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Aim: To strengthen the responsiveness of the health workforce against health impacts of climate crisis in Nepal and Zimbabwe. The specific objectives are: 1. To assess preparedness and capacities of health system actors to respond to climate crisis related health impacts 2. To co-create context sensitive and gender equitable interventions to improve HWF and community resilience to climate crisis related health impacts 3.To pilot the co-created interventions and evaluate them for equity, feasibility, effectiveness, costs, sustainability and scalability 4.To promote uptake of learning on climate crisis and health among health systems actors and researchers Methods: The study has six work packages. Work package 1 (Months 1-6): Setting up. We will refine our consortium values and consolidate our partnerships with communities, health system actors and expert advisory committee. With partners we will refine our theory of change and co-develop our research protocols before obtaining ethical approval. Work package 2 (Months 7-18): Formative research. We will conduct a scoping review on climate crisis impact on health and determinants of HWF responsiveness. We will conduct a policy analysis on content, actors, context and processes that influence HWF resilience to climate crisis. We will conduct qualitative studies to explore perceptions on climate crisis and HWF resilience. Finally, we will survey i) health facilities, ii) health workers, and iii) communities, to determine knowledge and practices about climate crisis. The surveys will form the baseline of our intervention evaluation. Work package 3 (Months 19-25): Intervention development. We will use findings from work package 2 to co-create interventions for improving HWF and community resilience to climate crisis. Possible interventions include training, performance management, establishing safe working environments, and strengthening links between communities and health workers. Work package 4 (Months 26-48): We will pilot and refine the interventions through participatory action research. Qualitative studies will inform intervention refinement. We will conduct detailed costing of intervention development and implementation and an endline survey to determine impact of the intervention on health worker and community knowledge on climate crisis and health. Work package 5: Throughout the study we will share findings with policy makers, managers, heath workers, community representatives and researchers. Work package 6: Throughout the study we will conduct training and capacity strengthening at different levels: individual – supporting 4 PhDs and 4 MScs; organisational - strengthening CeSHHAR and HERD capacity for financial and project management, and governance; community - through our citizen science approach, training community members to conduct research. Anticipated impact is improved HWF and community resilience to climate related health threats.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Strengthening responsiveness of health services provision to extreme weather events for urban marginalised people
Achieving Health Service Delivery Resilience During Climate-Induced Disasters among the Most Vulnerable Communities in Mozambique
'Crises Highligil and Zambia (REACHht' Building resilience to floods and heat in the maternal and child health system in Braz)
Developing Climate and Health Data Services (Based on Pathfinder Studies in Pakistan and Malawi)
AWareness Against Health ThReats of Climate ChangE (AWARE)

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.