Active Mental Health Psychology & Behaviour

A multi-centre, phase 3, randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Recovery Check-In aftercare intervention for people completing community treatment for alcohol and drug dependence. The SUbstance dependence ProsPective Outcome Recovery Trial (SUPPORT).

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A 12-month aftercare programme of 23 scheduled check-in calls is being tested to see if it keeps people off alcohol and drugs after they finish community treatment for dependence. Substance use disorders are notoriously hard to treat, with many patients cycling through remission, relapse, and re-admission. An aftercare model developed in the US has shown promise, but it has never been tested in the UK. This trial will fill that gap by comparing the Recovery Check-In intervention against the standard offer of information about local services alone. If the intervention proves effective and cost-effective, the researchers anticipate a NICE Technology Appraisal that could make it the standard aftercare for substance use disorder treatment across the NHS and third-sector services. That would mean a structured, fidelity-monitored support system—delivered by peer and professional workers—becoming routine for people leaving treatment, potentially reducing relapse rates and re-admissions. The study also includes an economic evaluation to determine whether the programme delivers value for money in terms of quality-adjusted life years.

View original technical description
RESEARCH QUESTION. For patients successfully completing treatment for alcohol, cannabis, ococaine or opioid use disorder, the SUbstance dependence ProsPective Outcome Recovery Trial (SUPPORT) will determine if a 12-month Recovery Check-In (RCI) intervention is effective and cost-effective. BACKGROUND. Substance use disorders (SUDs) are hard-to-treat, with many people experiencing cycles of remission, relapse and re-admission. Could an aftercare support intervention help people maintain their remission and recover? An aftercare recovery model has been developed and successfully evaluated in the USA – but not in the UK. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES. Compared with treatment-as-usual (TAU]) offer of information about local services only, the primary aim of SUPPORT is to determine if a UK-adapted Recovery Check-In (RCI) intervention is associated with more abstinence from alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and opioids, and is cost-effective. Exploratory secondary outcomes include whether the RCI is associated with reduced substance use; more remission; earlier time to (any) re-admission; and improvements in health, resilience, social support, and recovery. RCI effect moderation and mediation analyses of abstinence investigate change processes. A qualitative evaluation investigates participants’ experiences during follow-up. METHODS. This is a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement co-designed, multi-centre (20 NHS and Third Sector service), two-arm, parallel group, superiority randomised controlled trial. A target of 1,938 adult participants identified as successfully completing treatment will be randomly allocated (1:1 with stratification) to aftercare information only (n=969; TAU), or aftercare information and a RCI intervention (n=969; experimental condition). An internal pilot trial (n=120; 6 site) will address uncertainty about recruitment, adherence, retention and collection of outcome data. The RCI is a 23-contact, fidelity monitored, peer and professional worker delivered one-to-one, with 1 face-to-face meeting, then telephone contacts (month 1–2; fortnightly month 3–6; once per month in months 7–12). Researcher-administered telephone (optionally online and mail) interviews after 1 month (then quarterly to 12 months) record outcomes. The primary outcome is the total count of days after randomisation to 12 months on which the participant reports no use of alcohol, cannabis, cocaine and opioids by the field gold-standard Timeline Follow-Back interview. In the intention-to-treat population, an adjusted interval rate ratio (95% CI; two-sided alpha 0.05) from a mixed-effects regression model with multiple-imputation will estimate the RCI intervention effect. An economic evaluation will compute Quality Adjusted Life Years and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios. TIMELINES FOR DELIVERY. The study will be completed in 46 months (June 2025–March 2029). First and last participants are enrolled in October 2025 and October 2027, respectively. The last participant completes follow-up in October 2028. ANTICIPATED IMPACT AND DISSEMINATION. With evidence for effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, an envisaged NICE Technology Appraisal will enable the RCI to become the aftercare standard for SUD treatment. Study findings will be presented at a study conference; reported to medical and field journals; and produced in summary and in graphical formats to appeal to wide audiences.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Prevention of long term social disability amongst young people with emerging signs of severe mental illness: A pilot randomised controlled trial of social recovery cognitive behaviour therapy for young people with emerging severe mental illness.
RISKIT-CJS Pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multi-component intervention to reduce substance use and risk-behaviour in adolescents engaged with the criminal justice system.
SOLID (Supporting Looked after children In Decreasing Drugs, and alcohol): A multi-centre external pilot randomised controlled trial to decrease risky substance use (drugs and alcohol) and improve mental health and well-being of Looked After Children aged 12 -20 years
A randomised controlled trial, economic evaluation and qualitative study of supervised consumption in patients managed with opiate maintenance treatment
A multi-centre cluster-randomised controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent risky drinking in young people aged 14-15 in a high school setting (SIPS JR-HIGH)

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.