Active Cancer Digestion, Kidneys & Other Organs

Image guided laparoscopic liver resection: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Surgeons performing keyhole liver surgery will test a 3D image overlay system that projects a patient’s CT scan directly onto the laparoscopic video feed, helping them see hidden tumours and blood vessels during the operation. Laparoscopic liver resection is proven safe for many patients, but uptake for major operations remains slow. Surgeons cannot feel the liver during keyhole surgery, making it hard to judge where to cut cleanly around a tumour and avoid damaging major vessels or bile ducts. The SmartLiver system solves this by creating a personalised 3D model from the patient’s pre-operative scan and superimposing it in real time on the surgical view. This feasibility trial will run across three UK liver surgery centres, randomising eligible patients to SmartLiver-guided or standard laparoscopic resection. The team will measure recruitment rates, withdrawal, and technical success of the overlay. Secondary outcomes include complications, conversion to open surgery, blood transfusion needs, hospital stay, and quality of life. If the trial shows that a full randomised controlled trial is feasible, the next step would be a large-scale cost-effectiveness study. Success could lead to NICE approval and NHS adoption, potentially making complex keyhole liver surgery safer and more widely available.

View original technical description
Research question : The feasibility of a randomised controlled trial comparing the SmartLiver system of image guided liver surgery versus standard care in laparoscopic liver surgery. Background The laparoscopic approach to liver resection surgery has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in selected cases with level 1 evidence to support its use. However the uptake of the laparoscopic approach for major liver resections (3 or more liver segments) has been slow due to surgeons anxiety of defining cancer resection margins during laparoscopic surgery and the risk of injury to major vessels and bile ducts in the absence of the ability to palpate the tumour mass. Our solution was to develop a system in which the pre-operative CT scan of an individual patient is segmented to show individual structures within the liver and their relationship to the cancer being resected. This individualised 3D model of the liver is then super-imposed on the laparoscopic view of the liver at the time of the laparoscopic liver resection. The system development was funded by the Department of Health (DoH) and Wellcome Trust (WT) . The system was then further developed for clinical use in the operating theatres and evaluated in a single liver surgery centre (Royal Free Hospital) through an NIHR i4i fund. Aims and Objectives To determine the feasibility of comparing SmartLiver directed laparoscopic liver surgery with standard laparoscopic liver surgery in 3 seperate UK liver surgery centres. Methods Design: A pragmatic UK 3 centre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eligible patients will be those considered suitable for laparoscopic liver resection surgery in individual centres following review at the centre multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting and pre-operative assessment.. Eligible patients will be contacted by the research team and fully informed consent obtained for the clinical trial and qualitative evaluation. Consenting patients will be randomised using the Sealed Envelope randomisation system to : SMARTLiver-guided laparoscopic liver resection (intervention) Minimally invasive liver resection (intervention) guided by the SmartLIver system. Standard laparoscopic liver resection (control) Minimally invasive liver resection performed using a standardised protocol. End points. Feasibility end points of patient recruitment and withdrawal from the study. Technical feasibility of completion of the image overlay. Secondary end points will be used to select the primary end point and determine the power of a subsequent study to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the SmartLiver system. The secondandary end point will be complications, mortality, health-related quality of life, conversion to open surgery, operating time, blood transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, return to work or normal activities. Timelines for delivery: 36 months. 4 months pre-award preparation, 6 months completion trial governance and site set up. Recruitment 2 years, follow up 3 months. Data cleaning and analysis 3 months. Anticipated Impact and Dissemination End of study stakeholders event. Results presented at National and International Scientific meetings. PPI co-applicant will lead dissemination policy to specialist organisations and patient support groups. Subsequent NIHR HTA submission on cost effectiveness of the SmartLiver system. NICE approval, NHS adoption and wider international commercial development.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

A multi-modality, surgical planning and guidance system to improve the up-take of laparoscopic liver resection
A multicentre, randomised controlled trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Colorectal Surgery in the Acute Setting
Liver Resection Surgery Versus Thermal Ablation for Colorectal LiVer MetAstases
ORANGE II PLUS: An international multicentre randomised controlled trial of open versus laparoscopic hemihepatectomy
A randomised controlled trial to establish the clinical and cost effectiveness of expectant management versus pre-operative imaging with MRCP in patients with symptomatic gallstones undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at low or moderate risk of common bile duct stones: The Sunflower Study

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.