Completed Diabetes, Hormones & Metabolism Public Health & Healthcare

Non-pharmacological approaches to improving diabetes outcomes

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Nearly half of all diabetes patients in the UK have poor blood sugar control, and a major new programme of four linked studies will test whether brief, low-cost psychological interventions can help them manage their own care more effectively. The problem is that proven medical treatments for diabetes only work if patients consistently follow complex daily routines—checking blood sugar, taking medication, adjusting diet, and inspecting feet. Psychological and social factors often derail these self-care skills, yet few interventions are designed to address them directly. This programme targets that gap. The research tests four specific approaches: a large cohort study of 1,700 newly diagnosed Type 2 patients to identify which psychological factors predict poor control; a full trial of Motivational Enhancement Therapy for those with long-standing poor control; a pilot intervention for diabetic foot disease; and a proof-of-principle study for Type 1 patients with recurrent severe hypoglycaemia. All interventions are designed to be delivered by existing NHS staff with minimal training. If successful, these approaches could be rolled out across primary and secondary care, improving diabetes outcomes for socially and ethnically diverse populations without adding expensive new drugs or specialist staff.

View original technical description
Aims:The overarching aim of our programme is to test the need for and efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions to improve self-care skills, and thereby outcomes, for people with diabetes, in a variety of diabetes situations important in morbidity, mortality, quality of life and health expenditure. Background: Despite proven efficacy of strategies to reduce diabetes complications, nearly half of all patients with diabetes have suboptimal diabetes control. A major contributor to this may be reduced self-care skills resulting in impaired adherence to all aspects of diabetes care. The underlying hypothesis is that psychological and social factors impact on self–care skills and diabetes outcomes and are targets for effective intervention. Research plans Four projects address different clinical settings using mixed epidemiological, randomised controlled trial (RCT), and qualitative methodologies. Project 1, a prospective cohort study of ~1700 people with recently diagnosed Type 2 diabetes, will assess the association between psychological and social factors on glycaemic control and other cardiovascular risk factors at 2 years. This will provide important data for devising interventions to support people with diabetes in effective self-care thereafter. Projects 2, 3 and 4 are guided by the MRC framework for the evaluation of complex interventions and focus on people at high risk of complications. Key characteristics for each intervention are that they are brief, cost-effective, deliverable in primary and secondary care and accessible to a socially and ethnically diverse population. The interventions are deliverable by existing members of the health care team trained in a standardised, readily disseminated format, with built-in quality assurance. The interventions have either evidence of benefit in other lifestyle related diseases, e.g. obesity, or have suggestive but not conclusive evidence of benefit in diabetes. Project 2 is a phase 3 RCT in people with Type 2 diabetes for more than five years and persistent poor control. It will test the cost–effectiveness of Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET), a client centred, counselling style that facilitates behaviour change, to improve diabetes control. Project 3 is a phase I & 2 complex intervention in people with diabetic foot disease, combining MET techniques, educational theory, public health strategies and focus groups to improve outcomes. Project 4 is a preclinical and phase 1 proof of principle study in patients with type 1 diabetes and recurrent disabling hypoglycaemia. The study will model and pilot, using in-depth interviews, an intervention grounded in standard psychological and educational theory, aiming to reduce risk-taking behaviours in those with severe hypoglycaemia. All projects include a health economic assessment and will devise the training tools for rolling out each intervention using existing diabetes health care professionals and local resources. The Research Team is a multidisciplinary collaboration of diabetes and mental health professionals, primary and secondary care service delivery managers, a public health epidemiologist, an health economist, a statistician, user representatives and expert patients. Our diabetes service has one of the best-defined mental health links in the UK. The team has experience in RCTs and a track record of recruitment into cohort studies and RCTs in our community. The Research Environment is at King’s College Hospital (KCH), with Guy’s and St Thomas’ (GSTT) and the PCTs of Lambeth, Southwark & Lewisham, co-ordinated through the local Diabetes Clinical Network. Our academic partner is King’s College London, both the School of Medicine and the Institute of Psychiatry. The local community has high ethnic mix and severe social deprivation and is at very high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Access will be facilitated by liaison with the Starnet programme and the creation of a district wide diabetic eye screening register. Antic

View the original record at the funder ↗

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Improving diabetes outcomes for people with severe mental illness (SMI): a longitudinal observational and qualitative study of patients in England
The East Cambs and Fenland Diabetes Integrated Care Initiative
A pilot study to examine the feasibility of improving engagement with supported self-management in diabetic patients in disadvantaged populations.
Delivering a realistic Diabetes Prevention Programme in a UK community
Reducing the burden of type 2 diabetes: translating epidemiology and behavioural science into preventive action

Original classification

Research

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.