Criminal groups in Italy, the UK, and Japan are quietly winning the trust of the communities they exploit, and this project will find out why. Most explanations for why people tolerate criminal governance focus on fear, weak institutions, or low social trust. But that misses a crucial piece: people can come to see criminal authority as legitimate—morally justified, not just coerced. This project will develop a new tool to measure how individuals appraise criminal governance, then test it across three countries with strong state presence but known criminal influence. It will combine large-scale surveys, experiments, and longitudinal studies tracking adolescents in high-activity areas to untangle how ideologies, values, and identities sustain criminal authority over time. If successful, this research could transform how policymakers and educators understand and counter the social roots of organised crime. Instead of relying solely on policing or institutional reform, interventions could target the psychological and cultural mechanisms that make criminal governance feel normal or even desirable. The findings could inform school-based programmes, community engagement strategies, and public communications that undermine the legitimacy of criminal groups without requiring a heavy-handed state response.
View original technical description
Criminal groups are a vast economic threat. They also exert authority and governance in the territories where they operate, embedding themselves in the community's social fabric. Despite substantial hardships, communities rarely oppose criminal groups or cooperate with legal authorities against them. Prevalent explanations attribute communities' passivity to institutional weakness, fear or low social trust. However, psychological evidence indicates that authority cannot be grounded only in transactional or coercive relationships. Whereas institutional weakness may provide a space for criminal groups to arise, it cannot explain how they sustain authority. CrimGov pioneers a new multimethod approach addressing how the legitimization of criminal governance is fostered by ideologies, values and identities, and their interplay with macro-level factors. After creating a measure to capture individuals' appraisal of criminal governance, the project will gather quantitative evidence in three countries with a solid presence of the state and known instances of criminal governance: Italy, the UK and Japan. The project will use probability surveys with a cross-section of geographical subunits across countries. Multilevel models will test the interplay between individual- (e.g., ideologies), area- (e.g., average trust) and structural-level (e.g., GDP) factors. Experimental studies will examine the factors that help sustain the legitimacy of criminal governance across countries. Finally, longitudinal studies will focus on adolescence, a crucial period for the formation of attitudes toward authorities. The longitudinal studies will be conducted in communities with high criminal governance activity and will investigate the within-individual dynamics predicting the legitimization of both legal and criminal governance. CrimGov will transform the scientific understanding of criminal governance and provide evidence for substantiating policy recommendations and educational interventions.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know