Active Brain & Nervous System Psychology & Behaviour

Computations of transcriptomic neuron types in cortex

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

The brain’s cortex contains nearly 100 distinct subtypes of inhibitory neuron, and scientists have developed a way to identify which subtypes are active during behaviour in living mice. This matters because, while researchers can now catalogue the genetic identities of cortical neurons, they do not understand how these diverse cell types work together during real-time information processing. The team will combine two-photon calcium imaging, cell-type-specific viruses, and mathematical analysis to record the activity of identified neuron subtypes while mice behave spontaneously or perform tasks. They will test whether an animal’s cognitive state—such as attention, impulsiveness, or expectation of reward—controls how inhibitory neurons coordinate, and how that coordination shapes the activity of excitatory neurons that encode sensory information. This is fundamental science. It will not produce an immediate practical application. However, understanding how the cortex’s cell types are orchestrated during cognition could eventually inform treatments for neurological conditions where inhibitory circuits malfunction, such as epilepsy, schizophrenia, or autism spectrum disorders. Past discoveries about basic neural circuit principles have underpinned advances in brain-computer interfaces and neuromodulation therapies.

View original technical description
The cerebral cortex contains a rich diversity of neuronal types, particularly among inhibitory cells. Transcriptomic methods, which measure the expression of many genes simultaneously, have identified nearly 100 fine subtypes of cortical neuron. Understanding how these subtypes underlie cortical computation requires measuring the activity of large cortical populations in vivo, identifying each cell's transcriptomic subtype. We have developed a method to identify the transcriptomic subtypes of all cells in a population whose activity has been measured in vivo by 2-photon calcium imaging. We will use this together with tools such as 2-photon mesoscopy, cell-type-specific viruses and mathematical data analysis, to reveal for the first time how the cortex's cell types are coordinated during information processing. Our working hypothesis is that an animal's cognitive state controls the joint activity of inhibitory neurons, which in turn sculpt information coding in excitatory populations. We will test this hypothesis and characterize in detail of each cell type's role in the circuit. By recording during spontaneous behavior, we will ask if inhibitory population activity is constrained to a manifold reflecting fixed interactions between inhibitory subtypes, and how this inhibitory activity correlates with ongoing behavior and sensory coding in excitatory neurons. By recording transcriptomically-identified populations while mice perform a behavioral task, we will reveal how inhibitory activity and excitatory coding vary according to cognitive context such as stimulus expectation and omission, engagement, impulsiveness, and reward. By combining cell-type-specific optogenetics with transcriptomically identified recordings, we will reveal the causal role of each inhibitory subclass and of neuromodulators. Together, these experiments will provide foundational information on how information is processed by the diverse cell types that make up cortical circuits.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Kenneth Harris (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Large-scale analysis of neuronal population activity
Functional neuromics of the cerebral cortex.
Identifying subtype specific networks involved in sensory representation in mouse primary visual cortex
Assembly and organisation of inhibitory networks in the cerebral cortex
Dis-inhibitory circuits in the human cerebral cortex

Original classification

Research Grant

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.