VOLCANIC CLASSIC: VOLCANIC eruptions and CLimAte response - Stratospheric Sulfate isotopes in Ice Cores, data assimilation, and climate sensitivity
In plain English
AI plain-English summaryVolcanic eruptions have jolted the climate 233 times in the last 2,000 years, and a new project will use those natural experiments to pin down how sensitive the planet really is to atmospheric changes. Climate models disagree sharply on how much the Earth warms when carbon dioxide doubles, a gap that makes future projections unreliable. One reason is that models also disagree on how the climate responds to volcanic sulfate aerosols, which cool the planet for one to five years after an eruption. The problem has been uncertainty in both the volcanic forcing—how much sunlight the aerosols actually block—and the global temperature response. This project attacks both unknowns at once. By measuring sulfur isotopes in ice cores with new technology, the team will determine the precise amount of stratospheric sulfate from each eruption, along with its latitude and season. They will then compare that to improved reconstructions of past climate, built by feeding new paleoclimate records into data-assimilation models. If successful, the work will produce robust observational constraints on volcanic climate sensitivity, which can be used to test and refine the leading climate models. Because model responses to volcanoes and to CO₂ are linked, narrowing the volcanic uncertainty will directly tighten the range of plausible future warming. The results will also inform the debate on solar geoengineering, which deliberately mimics volcanic cooling. This is fundamental science with no immediate practical application, but it addresses a core question that has resisted resolution for decades.
View original technical description
View the original record at the funder ↗
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
Research GrantPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.Is something wrong? Let us know