Active Plants, Animals & Ecology Infection & Immunity

Acquisition of beneficial gut microbes and functional trade-offs in wild avian hosts

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Great tit chicks that swallow *Lactobacillus kimchicus* bacteria grow heavier than those that do not, but the reasons why remain unknown. This project tackles a fundamental gap in ecology: why wild animals carry wildly different gut microbiomes, and whether those differences actually matter for survival. Most microbiome knowledge comes from lab mice and humans, leaving wildlife ecology almost untouched. The researchers have already identified three bacterial strains in wild great and blue tits that predict nestling survival, and they have cultured one strain they can administer naturally in the wild. This is primarily curiosity-driven fundamental science. If it succeeds, it will reveal which specific microbes boost host fitness, how those microbes are acquired from the environment, and whether enhancing one trait—such as growth—comes at the cost of another, such as immunity or cognition. There is no immediate practical application, but understanding how beneficial microbes colonise wild hosts could eventually inform conservation strategies, captive breeding programmes, or even probiotic approaches for livestock. Past fundamental work on gut microbes in lab animals, for example, reshaped human medicine; this project could do the same for wildlife management.

View original technical description
Animals encounter a vast array of environmental microbes that colonise their bodies and fulfil a broad spectrum of symbiotic roles. Some bacterial strains, especially within the gut microbiome, provide crucial functions for hosts. Through actions of their unique genes, gut microbes profoundly shape host digestion, immunity and behaviour. Knowledge of the importance of gut microbes has been derived primarily from biomedical research, meaning that our understanding of how microbe-host processes operate to benefit wildlife is virtually non-existent. Major outstanding questions in ecology remain unanswered. A key unknown is whether the wide variation of observed taxonomic composition of wild gut microbiomes among individuals matter for hosts in nature. We will answer these questions by causally identifying which microbes are important for host fitness and determining why gut microbiomes are so variable in wildlife. We will identify beneficial bacteria by characterising their genetic function, by understanding how they support host phenotypes, and by determining the environmental conditions required for their acquisition. This programme draws on eight years of the PI’s extensive research on gut microbiome, behaviour and ecology of great tit (Parus major) and blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus) birds in the wild. Our pioneering work has identified at least three potentially beneficial gut microbes that predict nestling survival, and we cultured a fourth host-origin microbial strain, Lactobacillus kimchicus, that can be administered naturally in the wild, affecting nestling weight. Our breakthrough findings, extensive bank of gut microbiome samples, bioinformatics pipelines, and powerful methods for quantifying suites of host phenotypes in response to gut microbiome manipulations open exciting new pathways for understanding the ecology of beneficial microbes in wildlife. This will be achieved through the following objectives: Objective 1: Identify candidate beneficial microbes by characterising their genetic functions. L. kimchicus is dominated by protein and carbohydrate metabolism genes that may increase nutrient availability to the host, thus increasing weight. Given the broad taxonomic composition of the wild avian gut microbiome, other microbes are expected to contribute similar, or additional genetic functions for hosts. Pulling from our existing bank of gut microbiome samples, we will perform whole-genome shotgun sequencing to identify potentially beneficial microbes that have host-relevant metabolic pathway genes. Objective 2: Experimentally test for microbiome-mediated host phenotypic trade-offs. Our finding that nestling weight is affected by L. kimchicus is just one of several host phenotypes in the natal environment that could be microbially influenced. Moreover, phenotypic trade-off theory predicts that enhancing one trait can come at the expense of another, meaning perceived benefits are best understood in the context of host life history strategies. We will measure multiple host phenotypes (growth, immunity, behaviour, and cognition) following microbial enrichment manipulations to test if/which gut microbiota causally alter host phenotypes, and whether these gut microbes alleviate, or contribute to, phenotypic trade-offs. Objective 3: Identify origins of beneficial gut microbes. In wildlife, there is huge variation in the composition of gut microbiota among individuals and populations where the natal environment is a critical early-life window for gut microbiome acquisition. By simultaneously sampling environmental, dietary and parental sources of microbes, sophisticated microbiome tracking analyses will be deployed to make major advances in identifying source pools of potentially beneficial gut microbes. This interdisciplinary research programme will offer unprecedented basic and applied insights into natural gut microbiome variation, gut microbe functions and microbial source pools for wildlife.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Gabrielle Davidson (Principal Investigator)Lindsay Hall (Co-Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Probiotic interventions for understanding gut microbiome-mediated behaviour in wildlife
Understanding the interplay between the gut microbiome, behavior and urbanisation in wild birds
The ecology within: The impact of gut ecosystem dynamics on host fitness in the wild
The dynamics of microbiome interactions. (ref: 4276)
The wild mammalian microbiome

Original classification

Research and Innovation

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.