ROSALIE - RespOnSible ArtificiaL Intelligence Ecosystems - Comparing the UK and Germany
In plain English
AI plain-English summaryGermany and the UK are both building national AI strategies, but no one has systematically compared how responsibility for AI’s consequences actually works inside those two very different ecosystems. The problem is that while everyone talks about “ethical AI,” the concept of an AI ecosystem remains vague. It is not clear how cultural and institutional differences—such as Germany’s stronger data protection laws or the UK’s more market-driven approach—shape who gets blamed, who takes credit, and who is accountable when an AI system causes harm. ROSALIE fills this gap by treating AI not as a technology but as a socio-technical system embedded in specific national contexts. If the project succeeds, it will produce a detailed map of how responsibility is perceived, attributed, and enacted across the two countries. This could directly inform how governments design funding conditions, regulatory frameworks, and oversight mechanisms for AI. For example, a UK regulator might learn from Germany’s approach to stakeholder engagement, or a German ministry might adopt elements of the UK’s faster innovation pipeline without sacrificing accountability. The 30 expert interviews, 10 in-depth case studies, and cross-national workshops will generate concrete, evidence-based recommendations rather than abstract principles. This is applied, comparative social science. It will not build a better algorithm, but it could reshape the rules under which algorithms are built and deployed.
View original technical description
View the original record at the funder ↗
Researchers
Related Research
Grants with similar aims, by meaning.
Original classification
Research GrantPlain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research. Is something wrong? Let us know