Active Public Health & Healthcare Psychology & Behaviour

Understanding best practices for enabling purposeful public involvement and capturing public impact in rapid evidence research (RAPID-INVOLVE)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Public involvement in rapid research—studies that must deliver findings within three to six months—currently has no dedicated guidance, leaving public partners and researchers to adapt tools designed for slower, conventional studies. This matters because rapid evidence reviews and fast-turnaround interview studies increasingly inform urgent policy decisions, from pandemic responses to climate adaptation. Without tailored resources, diverse public voices—especially from underserved groups—risk being excluded from the decisions that affect them most. Existing frameworks like the PIRIT Toolkit and UK National Standards for Public Involvement work well for clinical trials or systematic reviews, but rapid projects have unique constraints: compressed timelines, shifting priorities, and limited capacity for iterative feedback. If successful, this project will produce a refined version of the PIRIT Toolkit—PIRIT-RAPID—alongside best-practice recommendations and new, inclusive methods for capturing the impact of public involvement. Researchers and policymakers will gain concrete tools to ensure that rapid evidence reflects a wider range of lived experiences. The work does not aim to generate new scientific findings; instead, it improves the infrastructure of how research itself is conducted, making fast-paced studies more equitable and accountable.

View original technical description
Context It is important that the public are involved in different types of research, including rapid research that informs policy and practice decision making. Inclusive opportunities for the public to be involved are essential to make sure that a range of diverse views influence this decision making. Researchers are trying to make sure that public involvement is part of fast paced research studies. This includes rapid evidence reviews (bringing together the findings of existing studies) or rapid primary research (for example, and interview study with patients). These projects typically take between 3 and 6 months. There are national standards and excellent resources available that help guide public involvement in research and to help capture the impact (or difference) the public involvement has made. This includes the PIRIT Toolkit and the UK National Standards for Public Involvement. However, there are no specific tools or guides for rapid research studies. Challenge There are limited guides and tools available showing the best way to involve public partners and capture the impact they make in rapid evidence research. We could and do draw upon the resources used in conventional research (e.g. clinical trials, systematic reviews, interview studies), but we have identified unique features of rapid research environments that warrant adapted and tailored public involvement and impact capture tools and resources. Further, we know that some people are underserved in rapid research environments and find it harder to have an influence and describe the difference they think their involvement has made. Some excellent resources already exist and so our underlying principle will be to adapt where possible but develop where needed. Aims and Objectives The aim of this study is to understand the best ways to support public involvement and capture their impact in rapid research settings. Our key objectives include: Understanding the opportunities for involvement and impact during rapid evidence research – this includes when and how public partners are involved, level of influence, barriers and facilitators, best practices and unique support needs Refining the PIRIT Toolkit so that it is suitable for use in rapid evidence research (PIRIT-RAPID) Identify novel and more inclusive ways to support underserved individuals to report impact and add these as complementary resources in the PIRIT Toolkit. Potential applications and benefits This project will develop a better understanding of public involvement in rapid evidence research environments. We will produce recommendations of best practice when involving members of the public in rapid research. We will update existing resources (e.g. PIRIT Toolkit) so that they can be used effectively in rapid evidence environments. We will also develop new and more inclusive ways to support people from underserved groups to be involved in the impact discussions. Our overall vision is to support to adapt, develop and mobilise a range of public involvement (PI) and impact capture resources for use in rapid evidence environments.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Denitza Williams (Co-Investigator)Natalie Joseph-WIlliams (Principal Investigator)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice.
Understanding the experience, costs and consequences of patient and public involvement in Primary Care research
Innovation in involvement
HPI: How do we achieve impactful patient and public involvement and engagement in statistical methodology research?
Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation

Original classification

Research and Innovation

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.