Completed Infection & Immunity

Severe corneal infections: Prevention, diagnosis and treatment

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Every year, corneal infections destroy the eyesight of thousands of people in low and middle-income countries, often because cheap, effective treatments never reach them in time. This research tackles a blinding infection called microbial keratitis (MK), caused by bacteria or fungi. The core problem is a cascade of failures: patients arrive late, often after using traditional eye medicines; health workers lack training; antifungal drugs are scarce and weak; and doctors cannot quickly tell whether the bug is bacterial or fungal. Meanwhile, the cornea ulcerates and perforates, driven by enzymes from both the pathogen and the patient’s own immune response. The project runs four linked trials. One tests whether chlorhexidine—a cheap antiseptic already used worldwide—works as well as the standard antifungal natamycin for fungal keratitis. Another tests ilomastat, a drug that blocks the tissue-destroying enzymes, to see if it can prevent corneal perforation. A third trial delivers an early-intervention package (chlorhexidine, smartphone-assisted diagnosis, and referral support) directly to communities, aiming to cut blindness by slashing the delay between infection and treatment. The fourth evaluates diagnostic tools, including automated image analysis and point-of-care tests, to identify the causative organism faster. If successful, this could shift the standard of care for millions of people, replacing expensive, scarce drugs with a cheap antiseptic and giving frontline health workers a practical toolkit to save sight.

View original technical description
Context: Blinding corneal infections (Microbial keratitis, MK), caused by bacteria or fungi, are a major ophthalmic public health problem in low and middle-income countries. There are multiple critical issues: delayed presentation, traditional eye medicine use, limited health-worker training, limited availability and efficacy of anti-fungals, diagnostic uncertainty. Eyes are lost through progressive corneal ulceration and perforation, mediated by human and pathogen-derived proteases. Proposed Research: 1. Randomised controlled trial (RCT) of topical chlorhexidine 0.2% vs. topical natamycin 5% for fungal keratitis. Pilot trials of chlorhexidine, a cheap and readily available antiseptic, suggest it might be at least as effective as natamycin (current standard). 2. RCT of topical ilomastat 0.08% vs. placebo, to reduce corneal perforation from MK. Ilomastat, a potent matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor, reduced severe ulceration in animal models and earlier human clinical trials. Full-scale treatment trials are needed for translation into practice. 3. Cluster RCT of early intervention package (topical chlorhexidine, smartphone-assisted diagnosis, treatment, referral support) vs. standard practices, to reduce blindness from MK through reducing delay between infection onset and initiating intensive treatment, with an agent covering fungi and bacteria. 4. Evaluation of diagnostic approaches for identifying causative organism in MK (clinical, automated image-analysis, confocal microsopy, PCR) and testing potential isothermal point-of-care tests.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Matthew Burton (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

VISION-PATH: Advancing Diagnosis and Treatment of Microbial Keratitis to Improve Patient Outcomes
Pathways to reducing the burden of corneal ulcer in India and beyond
Modelling the corneal microbiome to improve identification of pathogenic microorganisms
Novel strategies for diagnosis and scar prevention in patients with microbial keratitis
Studies in the pathophysiology and management of corneal necrosis in severe microbial keratitis

Original classification

Senior Research Fellowship Clinical Renewal

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.