Active Public Health & Healthcare

Multi-centre Antivenom Trial in Africa

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

A hospital-based trial across multiple African countries will directly compare existing and new antivenoms head-to-head in patients suffering from snakebite. This matters because sub-Saharan Africa has almost no reliable data on which antivenoms actually work and are safe. Currently, antivenoms enter the market based only on animal studies or small, uncontrolled human observations, leaving health policymakers and clinicians to guess which products to use. Without evidence, patients may receive ineffective or unsafe treatments. If this trial succeeds, it will produce the first robust evidence on antivenom efficacy for the two most common life-threatening syndromes—coagulopathy and shock—as well as for the rarer presentation of neurotoxicity. Policymakers in each country could then select the best antivenom for their population, replacing guesswork with data. For patients, this means a higher chance of receiving a treatment that actually stops the venom’s effects, reducing death and disability from snakebite across the region.

View original technical description
Snakebite can cause life-threatening systemic envenoming that can be treated by rapid administration of safe and effective antivenom. However, there are extremely limited data on the efficacy and safety of antivenoms in sub-Saharan Africa. Antivenoms are entering the market based on animal studies or limited observational human studies with consequent challenges for health policy- makers and clinicians about which antivenoms are best for patients. We aim to conduct a hospital-based multi-country, multi-site Randomised Controlled Trial among adults, adolescents and children over 2 years old to evaluate efficacy and safety of a range of existing and new antivenoms, developing evidence for policy-makers on the optimum antivenoms for their countries. The efficacy of each antivenom in treating acute systemic envenoming will be compared to other locally relevant antivenoms, with a particular focus on the two primary syndromes of coagulopathy and shock. In participants with the rare presentation of neurotoxicity alone, we will estimate overall efficacy and safety rates for each appropriate antivenom. We will enrol approximately 1000 participants with coagulopathy, 1000 participants with shock, and 100 participants with neurotoxicity across ten sites in sub-Saharan Africa, using a novel Personalised RAndomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical) design, with each participant followed for 42 days from randomisation.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Abdulrazaq Habib (EPMC Awardee)Ann Walker (EPMC Awardee)David Lalloo (EPMC Awardee)David Williams (EPMC Awardee)Francesca Schiavone (EPMC Awardee)Frank-Leonel Tianyi Tianyi (EPMC Awardee)Geoffrey Isbister (EPMC Awardee)George Oluoch (EPMC Awardee)Ian White (EPMC Awardee)John Amuasi (EPMC Awardee)Mainga Hamaluba (EPMC Awardee)Nicholas Casewell (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Novel immuno-proteomic strategies to develop a polyspecific, non-cold chain liquid snake antivenom with unparalleled sub-Saharan African efficacy
Antivenom clinical trial development
Antivenom Clinical Methodology Development
Recombinant snakebite antivenom for sub-Saharan Africa
Replacement in vivo preclinical models to substantially refine and reduce severe protocols used in snakebite envenoming research

Original classification

Discretionary Award

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.