ActivePublic Health & HealthcareMental Health

Child sexual abuse and recovery: historicising survivor and practitioner experiences (c1950-2022)

In plain English

AI plain-English summary

Child sexual abuse survivors are told to “heal wounds” and “repair damage” using a language borrowed from medicine, but this framework often ignores the social and practical support they actually need to recover. This research addresses a fundamental gap: while clinical treatments for CSA are measured for efficacy, survivors’ own views and experiences are routinely sidelined, and the role of context—time, place, identity, structural inequality—is overlooked. The project is the first social, cultural and medical history of recovery from CSA in Britain and Ireland during the second half of the twentieth century. It uses a mixed-methods approach to bring together survivors and frontline practitioners, two groups whose perspectives are rarely included in the historical record. If successful, this work could reshape how public services—including healthcare, social welfare, and policy—respond to CSA. Instead of defaulting to psychological recovery alone, practitioners might learn from past experiences to offer a broader range of support that addresses emotional and physical equilibrium. The research is primarily historical and qualitative, not a clinical trial, but its insights could influence present-day practice and policy by giving survivors and practitioners a voice in how recovery is understood and delivered.

View original technical description
Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) is not an illness or a physical wound. And yet recovery is spoken about in a language borrowed from medicine, we seek to ‘heal wounds’ and ‘repair damage.’ The language and ‘logics’ of trauma now dominate public services, emphasising psychological recovery and ignoring other forms of social support that individuals need to achieve emotional and physical equilibrium’.(1) In research, survivors’ needs are ignored in favour of measuring the clinical efficacy of specific treatments.(2) Their recovery is frequently hindered rather than helped by medical and social welfare interventions.(3) Their views are given less credence, their ‘stories’ are generalised across time, place and identity.(4) The experiences of the minoritized and structural inequalities are ignored. But, as Joanna Bourke has shown, context matters in relation to effective responses to sexual violence.(5) This is the first social, cultural and medical history into recovery from CSA in the second half of twentieth century Britain and Ireland. Via a mixed methods approach, it will offer a rare insight into the experiences of survivors and frontline practitioners, who are commonly left out of the historical record. It brings the two groups together to learn from past experiences and influence present-day practice and policy.

View the original record at the funder ↗

Researchers

Ruth Beecher (EPMC Awardee)

Related Research

Grants with similar aims, by meaning.

Original classification

Career Development Award

Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.