CompletedLungs & BreathingDigestion, Kidneys & Other Organs
A 2x2 factorial randomised open label trial to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of hypertonic saline (HTS 6%) and carbocisteine for airway clearance versus usual care over 52 weeks in bronchiectasis
A simple salt solution and an existing cough medicine are being tested together to see if they can cut the number of lung infections in people with bronchiectasis, a chronic condition where damaged airways trap mucus and breed bacteria. People with bronchiectasis often suffer repeated chest infections that require antibiotics, damaging their lungs further over time. Current treatments focus on clearing mucus with physiotherapy, but there is no clear evidence that commonly used mucus-thinning drugs actually reduce infection rates. This trial directly compares two such drugs—nebulised hypertonic saline and oral carbocisteine, alone and in combination—against standard care alone. If either drug, or the combination, proves effective, it could give clinicians a cheap, widely available tool to prevent exacerbations, reduce antibiotic use, and slow lung decline. The trial also measures quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and health service costs, so the NHS could decide whether the benefit justifies routine prescription. For patients, fewer infections would mean fewer hospital visits and better day-to-day breathing.
View original technical description
DESIGN: A multicentre 2x2 factorial randomised open label clinical and cost-effectiveness trial in BE with an internal pilot. SETTING: 16 NHS sites part of NIHR LCRN/NICRN, BRONCH-UK and/or EMBARC networks. POPULATION: 380 adults with confirmed diagnosis on HRCT/CT of BE and two or more pulmonary exacerbations within the last year requiring antibiotics. INCLUSION CRITERIA: BE on HRCT/CT; BE the primary respiratory diagnosis; =2 exacerbations in the last year; daily sputum; stable for =14 days; willing to continue existing medication; females must be surgically sterile, postmenopausal or willing to use contraception. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: patients 25 pack years or female ex-smokers with >20 pack years; FEV1<30%; long-term macrolides started within 1 month; regular isotonic saline; treatment with study drugs or other mucoactive within 30 days; intolerance or contraindication to HTS/carbocisteine; hypersensitivity to carbocisteine or its excipients; peptic ulceration; hereditary galactose intolerance, Lapp-lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption; patients unable to swallow oral capsules; women pregnant or lactating; participation in a CTIMP within 30 days. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY: Assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of HTS 6% and carbocisteine (alone, or in combination) for airway clearance over 52 weeks in bronchiectasis, with a 52-week follow-up period. Patients randomised to receive either (i) nebulised HTS (6%), (ii) carbocisteine, (iii) a combination of nebulised HTS (6%) and carbocisteine, or (iv) standard care alone. All patients irrespective of group allocation will receive usual care including airway clearance techniques according to BTS guidelines. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is mean number exacerbations over 52 weeks. Secondary outcomes include disease-specific HRQoL, time to next exacerbation, number of days of antibiotics, generic HRQoL, health service use, QALY, health impairment, treatment satisfaction, adverse events, lung function, and adherence. SAMPLE SIZE: For the primary outcome, based on a pooled SD of 0.9 exacerbations, 216 patients would allow detection of a mean difference between groups of 0.4 exacerbations with 90% power and at the 5% significance level. To allow for potential interaction between interventions, 50% inflation has been included, to 324 patients. Assuming an approximate dropout of 15% gives 380 patients (95 in each group) and over 90% power to detect a minimally important difference of 8 points for the QoL-B scale (SD of 18) at the 5% significance level. This sample size is also sufficient to detect a 75% increase in median time to exacerbation at 98% power, and a medium effect size for other secondary outcomes at 95% power and 5% level of significance. RANDOMISATION: Patients randomised at a 1:1:1:1 ratio using an automated randomisation system. Randomisation stratified by site, to minimise baseline imbalances in antibiotic use in the last year, and current use of macrolides. EXPERTISE: Co-applicants are members of NIHR LCRNs/NICRN and BRONCH-UK and/or EMBARC. All are experts in clinical trial methodology, have led international multicentre trials and have published widely.
Plain English summaries and category classifications on this site are generated by AI and may not perfectly reflect the original research.
Is something wrong? Let us know